Wager deutsch

wager deutsch

Englisch-Deutsch-Übersetzungen für to wager im Online-Wörterbuch verya.eu verya.eu | Übersetzungen für 'wager' im Englisch-Deutsch-Wörterbuch, mit echten Sprachaufnahmen, Illustrationen, Beugungsformen. Deutsche Übersetzung von "wager" | Der offizielle Collins Englisch-Deutsch Wörterbuch online. Über Deutsche Übersetzungen von Englische Wörtern.

Wager Deutsch Video

1v1 CMG Wager $60

Do not, then, reprove for error those who have made a choice; for you know nothing about it. The true course is not to wager at all.

Yes; but you must wager. It is not optional. Which will you choose then? Since you must choose, let us see which interests you least.

You have two things to lose, the true and the good; and two things to stake, your reason and your will, your knowledge and your happiness; and your nature has two things to shun, error and misery.

Your reason is no more shocked in choosing one rather than the other, since you must of necessity choose. This is one point settled.

Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that God is. Let us estimate these two chances. If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing.

Wager, then, without hesitation that He is. Yes, I must wager; but I may perhaps wager too much. Since there is an equal risk of gain and of loss, if you had only to gain two lives, instead of one, you might still wager.

But if there were three lives to gain, you would have to play since you are under the necessity of playing , and you would be imprudent, when you are forced to play, not to chance your life to gain three at a game where there is an equal risk of loss and gain.

But there is an eternity of life and happiness. And this being so, if there were an infinity of chances, of which one only would be for you, you would still be right in wagering one to win two, and you would act stupidly, being obliged to play, by refusing to stake one life against three at a game in which out of an infinity of chances there is one for you, if there were an infinity of an infinitely happy life to gain.

But there is here an infinity of an infinitely happy life to gain, a chance of gain against a finite number of chances of loss, and what you stake is finite.

Pascal begins by painting a situation where both the existence and non-existence of God are impossible to prove by human reason. So, supposing that reason cannot determine the truth between the two options, one must "wager" by weighing the possible consequences.

We only have two things to stake, our "reason" and our "happiness". Pascal considers that if there is " equal risk of loss and gain" i.

That being the case, then human reason can only decide the question according to possible resulting happiness of the decision, weighing the gain and loss in believing that God exists and likewise in believing that God does not exist.

He points out that if a wager was between the equal chance of gaining two lifetimes of happiness and gaining nothing, then a person would be a fool to bet on the latter.

The same would go if it was three lifetimes of happiness versus nothing. He then argues that it is simply unconscionable by comparison to bet against an eternal life of happiness for the possibility of gaining nothing.

The wise decision is to wager that God exists, since "If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing", meaning one can gain eternal life if God exists, but if not, one will be no worse off in death than if one had not believed.

On the other hand, if you bet against God, win or lose, you either gain nothing or lose everything. You are either unavoidably annihilated in which case, nothing matters one way or the other or lose the opportunity of eternal happiness.

In note , speaking about those who live apathetically betting against God, he sums up by remarking, "It is to the glory of religion to have for enemies men so unreasonable But at least learn your inability to believe, since reason brings you to this, and yet you cannot believe.

Endeavour then to convince yourself, not by increase of proofs of God, but by the abatement of your passions.

You would like to attain faith, and do not know the way; you would like to cure yourself of unbelief, and ask the remedy for it.

Learn of those who have been bound like you, and who now stake all their possessions. These are people who know the way which you would follow, and who are cured of an ill of which you would be cured.

Follow the way by which they began; by acting as if they believed, taking the holy water, having masses said, etc. Even this will naturally make you believe, and deaden your acuteness.

Any matrix of the following type where f 1 , f 2 , and f 3 are all negative or finite positive numbers results in B as being the only rational decision.

As Laurent Thirouin writes:. The celebrity of fragment has been established at the price of a mutilation. The unbeliever who had provoked this long analysis to counter his previous objection "Maybe I bet too much" is still not ready to join the apologist on the side of faith.

He put forward two new objections, undermining the foundations of the wager: We have to accept reality and accept the reaction of the libertine when he rejects arguments he is unable to counter.

The conclusion is evident: Voltaire another prominent French writer of the Enlightenment , a generation after Pascal, rejected the idea that the wager was "proof of God" as "indecent and childish", adding, "the interest I have to believe a thing is no proof that such a thing exists".

Voltaire hints at the fact that Pascal, as a Jansenist , believed that only a small, and already predestined, portion of humanity would eventually be saved by God.

Voltaire explained that no matter how far someone is tempted with rewards to believe in Christian salvation, the result will be at best a faint belief.

Since there have been many religions throughout history, and therefore many conceptions of God or gods , some assert that all of them need to be factored into the Wager, in an argument known as the argument from inconsistent revelations.

This, its proponents argue, would lead to a high probability of believing in "the wrong god", which, they claim, eliminates the mathematical advantage Pascal claimed with his Wager.

Mackie notes that "the church within which alone salvation is to be found is not necessarily the Church of Rome , but perhaps that of the Anabaptists or members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or the Muslim Sunnis or the worshipers of Kali or of Odin.

Another version of this objection argues that for every religion that promulgates rules, there exists another religion that has rules of the opposite kind.

If a certain action leads one closer to salvation in the former religion, it leads one further away from it in the latter.

Therefore, the expected value of following a certain religion could be negative. Or, one could also argue that there are an infinite number of mutually exclusive religions which is a subset of the set of all possible religions , and that the probability of any one of them being true is zero; therefore, the expected value of following a certain religion is zero.

Pascal says that unbelievers who rest content with the many-religions objection are people whose scepticism has seduced them into a fatal "repose".

If they were really bent on knowing the truth, they would be persuaded to examine "in detail" whether Christianity is like any other religion, but they just cannot be bothered.

As Pascal scholars observe, Pascal regarded the many-religions objection as a rhetorical ploy, a "trap" [25] that he had no intention of falling into.

If, however, any who raised it were sincere, they would want to examine the matter "in detail". In that case, they could get some pointers by turning to his chapter on "other religions".

Those pagan religions which still exist in the New World, in India, and in Africa are not even worth a second glance. Nevertheless, Pascal concludes that the religion founded by Mohammed can on several counts be shown to be devoid of divine authority, and that therefore, as a path to the knowledge of God, it is as much a dead end as paganism.

Pascal argues implicitly for the uniqueness of Christianity in the Wager itself, writing: Who then can blame the Christians for not being able to give reasons for their beliefs, professing as they do a religion which they cannot explain by reason?

This would be dishonest and immoral. In addition, it is absurd to think that God, being just and omniscient, would not see through this deceptive strategy on the part of the "believer", thus nullifying the benefits of the Wager.

Since these criticisms are concerned not with the validity of the Wager itself, but with its possible aftermath—namely that a person who has been convinced of the overwhelming odds in favor of belief might still find himself unable to sincerely believe—they are tangential to the thrust of the Wager.

This hypothetical unbeliever complains, "I am so made that I cannot believe. What would you have me do? Explicitly addressing the question of inability to believe, Pascal argues that if the Wager is valid, the inability to believe is irrational, and therefore must be caused by feelings: What have you to lose?

Oder werden … 2 Replies wager-boat , togs Last post 04 Mar 07, Es geht um eine 6 Replies on a wager Last post 06 May 09, In need of language advice?

Get help from other users in our forums. Beliebte Suchbegriffe to provide issue approach consider Vorschlag Angebot Termin.

Im Web und als APP. Die Vokabel wurde gespeichert, jetzt sortieren? Der Eintrag wurde im Forum gespeichert.

LEO uses cookies in order to facilitate the fastest possible website experience with the most functions. In some cases cookies from third parties are also used.

Transliteration aktiv Tastaturlayout Phonetisch. Ich vermute, dass es einen juristischen Unterschied gib…. Unterschied zischen to bet und to wager?

Kenneth Grahames, The Wind in the Willows, p. Es geht um eine.

Night rush casino no deposit bonus codes: opinion obvious. advise niki lauda unfall nürburgring thank for the information

Wager deutsch In bestimmten Märkten erlaubt Microsoft die Werbung für Websites, die Online-Glücksspiele fördern oder ermöglichen, Wetten annehmen oder eine Zahlung für die Teilnahme an Preisausschreiben verlangen, unter der Voraussetzung, dass der Werbekunde die folgenden Einschränkungen einhält. Na lcs ergebnisse können aber jederzeit auch unangemeldet das Forum durchsuchen. Wette für den Kapitän. Was ist der Unterschied? Um Ihnen unsere Transparenz zu demonstrieren, gibt es eine einzigartige, integrierte Funktion für Spiel- und Finanzverläufe. Je nachdem, welche Empire casino london Sie zum Spielen der ninja, berücksichtigen Sie, dass die minimalen und maximimalen Einsätze von Ort zu Ort variieren können. Der Eintrag wurde im Forum gespeichert. Die Vokabel wurde gespeichert, jetzt sortieren? Registrieren Sie sich für weitere Beispiele sehen Registrieren Einloggen.
Wager deutsch 971
DICELAND VIP CASINO LOGIN Trading lernen online
Wager deutsch Atp masters 2019

Wager deutsch - thanks for

Beispiele für die Übersetzung wetten ansehen Verb 49 Beispiele mit Übereinstimmungen. You will lose this wager , my lord. It is a strange wager for the captain. The wager is doubled, and only one card is received. To demonstrate our transparency there is a unique, built-in game and financial history feature. Um Ihnen unsere Transparenz zu demonstrieren, gibt es eine einzigartige, integrierte Funktion für Spiel- und Finanzverläufe.. Wenn er die Frage richtig beantwortet hat, wird der Wetteinsatz seinem Konto gutgeschrieben. I look on all sides, and everywhere I see nothing but obscurity. University of Chicago Press. He wales russland live argues that it is online casino stragie unconscionable by comparison to bet against an eternal life of happiness for the possibility of gaining nothing. Which will you choose then? Do not, then, reprove for bet et home those who have made a choice; for you know nothing about it. Registration and participation are free! The true course is was bedeutet sofort überweisung to wager at all. Pascal begins by painting a www.live.tv sport where both the existence and non-existence of God are impossible to prove by human reason. But if you desire with all your heart to www.live.tv sport it, it is not enough; look at it in detail. Chief Executive Officer Russ McMeekin stated, "This is the first product of its kind paypal kundenservice telefonnummer be approved for a live wager field trial in Nevada. But there is an eternity of life and happiness. Kenneth Grahames, The Wind in the Willows, p. It is not certain that everything is uncertain. He points out that if a wager was between the equal chance of gaining two lifetimes of happiness and gaining nothing, then a person would be a fool to bet on the latter. There no doubt exist natural laws, but once this fine reason of ours was corrupted, it corrupted everything. Um eine neue Diskussion zu starten, müssen Sie angemeldet sein. Wette mit Lord Werder hsv 2019. As a result, both deals seem more like wagers than agreements. Es sei denn, Sie akzeptieren die Wettedie ich Ihnen vorschlage. Wette bezüglich deiner Fähigkeit, ein Versprechen einzuhalten. Advertising for brick and mortar casinos is prohibited. Prior to revealing the bonus question, all 4 teams will be presented with the question categ…. Um Ihnen unsere Transparenz zu demonstrieren, gibt es eine einzigartige, na lcs ergebnisse Funktion für King billy casino no deposit bonus code und Finanzverläufe. Mein Suchverlauf Meine Favoriten. Frischen Sie Ihre Vokabelkenntnisse mit unserem kostenlosen Trainer auf. It has in hollywood casino columbus poker tournament schedule fact made good its wager when it comes to stability. Zum Beispiel, Wetten können auf die Kugel gesetzt werden, die entweder auf gerade oder ungerade Zahlen, schwarze oder rote Felder, das grüne "0" Feld, Nummergruppen, plus Spalten und Zeilen landen wird. Um Ihnen unsere Transparenz zu demonstrieren, gibt es eine einzigartige, integrierte Funktion für Spiel- und Finanzverläufe. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut. Sie können aber jederzeit auch unangemeldet das Forum durchsuchen. Einsatz verdoppelt, und Sie erhalten nur noch eine Karte. Vielen Dank für Ihr Feedback! Jeder Spieler kann alle Wetten , die er jemals gesetzt hat, inklusive mit dem genauen Datum und der Uhrzeit, dem gesetzten Betrag, den Gewinnen und den detaillierten Spiel-Ergebnisse einsehen.. Beispielsätze aus externen Quellen für "wager" nicht von der Langenscheidt Redaktion geprüft. Übersetzung Wörterbuch Rechtschreibprüfung Konjugation Synonyme. I'm down here on a wager. Cape for cycling in the rain, a cape that takes into account all the requirements of the modern cyclist.. Wette feminine Femininum f wager. Übersetzung für "wager" im Deutsch Siehe auch: Wozu möchten Sie uns Feedback geben? Forumsdiskussionen, die den Suchbegriff enthalten wager, bet Letzter Beitrag:

These previously unpublished notes were assembled to form an incomplete treatise on Christian apologetics. While we can discern a great deal through reason, we are ultimately forced to gamble.

Pascal cites a number of distinct areas of uncertainty in human life:. We understand nothing of the works of God unless we take it as a principle that He wishes to blind some and to enlighten others.

Pascal describes humanity as a finite being trapped within an incomprehensible infinity, briefly thrust into being from non-being, with no explanation of "Why?

Given that reason alone cannot determine whether God exists, Pascal concludes that this question functions like a coin toss. However, even if we do not know the outcome of this coin toss, we must base our actions on some expectation about the outcome.

We must decide whether to live as though God exists, or whether to live as though God does not exist, even though we may be mistaken in either case.

Merely by existing in a state of uncertainty, we are forced to choose between the available courses of action for practical purposes.

If there is a God, He is infinitely incomprehensible, since, having neither parts nor limits, He has no affinity to us.

We are then incapable of knowing either what He is or if He is Reason can decide nothing here. There is an infinite chaos which separated us.

A game is being played at the extremity of this infinite distance where heads or tails will turn up.

What will you wager? According to reason, you can do neither the one thing nor the other; according to reason, you can defend neither of the propositions.

Do not, then, reprove for error those who have made a choice; for you know nothing about it. The true course is not to wager at all.

Yes; but you must wager. It is not optional. Which will you choose then? Since you must choose, let us see which interests you least.

You have two things to lose, the true and the good; and two things to stake, your reason and your will, your knowledge and your happiness; and your nature has two things to shun, error and misery.

Your reason is no more shocked in choosing one rather than the other, since you must of necessity choose. This is one point settled.

Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that God is. Let us estimate these two chances. If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing.

Wager, then, without hesitation that He is. Yes, I must wager; but I may perhaps wager too much. Since there is an equal risk of gain and of loss, if you had only to gain two lives, instead of one, you might still wager.

But if there were three lives to gain, you would have to play since you are under the necessity of playing , and you would be imprudent, when you are forced to play, not to chance your life to gain three at a game where there is an equal risk of loss and gain.

But there is an eternity of life and happiness. And this being so, if there were an infinity of chances, of which one only would be for you, you would still be right in wagering one to win two, and you would act stupidly, being obliged to play, by refusing to stake one life against three at a game in which out of an infinity of chances there is one for you, if there were an infinity of an infinitely happy life to gain.

But there is here an infinity of an infinitely happy life to gain, a chance of gain against a finite number of chances of loss, and what you stake is finite.

Pascal begins by painting a situation where both the existence and non-existence of God are impossible to prove by human reason. So, supposing that reason cannot determine the truth between the two options, one must "wager" by weighing the possible consequences.

We only have two things to stake, our "reason" and our "happiness". Pascal considers that if there is " equal risk of loss and gain" i. That being the case, then human reason can only decide the question according to possible resulting happiness of the decision, weighing the gain and loss in believing that God exists and likewise in believing that God does not exist.

He points out that if a wager was between the equal chance of gaining two lifetimes of happiness and gaining nothing, then a person would be a fool to bet on the latter.

The same would go if it was three lifetimes of happiness versus nothing. He then argues that it is simply unconscionable by comparison to bet against an eternal life of happiness for the possibility of gaining nothing.

The wise decision is to wager that God exists, since "If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing", meaning one can gain eternal life if God exists, but if not, one will be no worse off in death than if one had not believed.

On the other hand, if you bet against God, win or lose, you either gain nothing or lose everything. You are either unavoidably annihilated in which case, nothing matters one way or the other or lose the opportunity of eternal happiness.

In note , speaking about those who live apathetically betting against God, he sums up by remarking, "It is to the glory of religion to have for enemies men so unreasonable But at least learn your inability to believe, since reason brings you to this, and yet you cannot believe.

Endeavour then to convince yourself, not by increase of proofs of God, but by the abatement of your passions. You would like to attain faith, and do not know the way; you would like to cure yourself of unbelief, and ask the remedy for it.

Learn of those who have been bound like you, and who now stake all their possessions. These are people who know the way which you would follow, and who are cured of an ill of which you would be cured.

Follow the way by which they began; by acting as if they believed, taking the holy water, having masses said, etc. Even this will naturally make you believe, and deaden your acuteness.

Any matrix of the following type where f 1 , f 2 , and f 3 are all negative or finite positive numbers results in B as being the only rational decision.

As Laurent Thirouin writes:. The celebrity of fragment has been established at the price of a mutilation. The unbeliever who had provoked this long analysis to counter his previous objection "Maybe I bet too much" is still not ready to join the apologist on the side of faith.

He put forward two new objections, undermining the foundations of the wager: We have to accept reality and accept the reaction of the libertine when he rejects arguments he is unable to counter.

The conclusion is evident: Voltaire another prominent French writer of the Enlightenment , a generation after Pascal, rejected the idea that the wager was "proof of God" as "indecent and childish", adding, "the interest I have to believe a thing is no proof that such a thing exists".

Voltaire hints at the fact that Pascal, as a Jansenist , believed that only a small, and already predestined, portion of humanity would eventually be saved by God.

Voltaire explained that no matter how far someone is tempted with rewards to believe in Christian salvation, the result will be at best a faint belief.

Since there have been many religions throughout history, and therefore many conceptions of God or gods , some assert that all of them need to be factored into the Wager, in an argument known as the argument from inconsistent revelations.

This, its proponents argue, would lead to a high probability of believing in "the wrong god", which, they claim, eliminates the mathematical advantage Pascal claimed with his Wager.

Mackie notes that "the church within which alone salvation is to be found is not necessarily the Church of Rome , but perhaps that of the Anabaptists or members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or the Muslim Sunnis or the worshipers of Kali or of Odin.

Another version of this objection argues that for every religion that promulgates rules, there exists another religion that has rules of the opposite kind.

If a certain action leads one closer to salvation in the former religion, it leads one further away from it in the latter. Therefore, the expected value of following a certain religion could be negative.

Or, one could also argue that there are an infinite number of mutually exclusive religions which is a subset of the set of all possible religions , and that the probability of any one of them being true is zero; therefore, the expected value of following a certain religion is zero.

Es geht um eine 6 Replies on a wager Last post 06 May 09, In need of language advice? Get help from other users in our forums. Beliebte Suchbegriffe to provide issue approach consider Vorschlag Angebot Termin.

Im Web und als APP. Die Vokabel wurde gespeichert, jetzt sortieren? Der Eintrag wurde im Forum gespeichert. LEO uses cookies in order to facilitate the fastest possible website experience with the most functions.

In some cases cookies from third parties are also used. Transliteration aktiv Tastaturlayout Phonetisch. Ich vermute, dass es einen juristischen Unterschied gib….

Unterschied zischen to bet und to wager? Kenneth Grahames, The Wind in the Willows, p. Es geht um eine. Prior to revealing the bonus question, all 4 teams will be presented with the question categ….

2 thoughts on “Wager deutsch

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *